So it line of imagine could have been most important during the feminist philosophy. Including, More youthful holds one Spelman has actually definitively revealed one to gender reality is actually untenable (1997, 13). Mikkola (2006) contends this particular is not therefore. The new objections Spelman helps make don’t undermine the concept there is a few characteristic function, sense, preferred position or standard you to definitely describes ladies’ gender; they just claim that specific variety of way of cashing aside exactly what defines womanhood try misguided. Thus, regardless of if Spelman is good to help you reject people profile that incorrectly need new function one to criteria light middle-class Western feminists’ gender in order to position ladies gender typically, it leaves open the chance that feminine qua feminine would share something talks of the gender. (Look for and additionally Haslanger [2000a] getting a dialogue away from as to why gender realism is not necessarily untenable, and Stoljar for a discussion out-of Mikkola’s criticism off Spelman.)