Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A great., & Rumiati, R. We. (2021). The latest sum out-of identification and cleverness on cognitive competences within the high education. Frontiers inside the Therapy, twelve, 2566.

Damian, Roentgen. We., Spengler, M., Sutu, An excellent., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 going on sixty-six: Good longitudinal examination of identity stability and change around the 50 years. Record off Character and Societal Mindset, 117(3), 674.

Daurio, A great. Yards., & Taylor, J. (2022). A study of the triarchic make of psychopathy and you may care about-reported Class B character disorder faculties. Personality Disorders: Idea, Browse, and you can Medication, 13(2), 153.

Furnham, A good., & Monsen, J. (2009). Character traits and you will cleverness expect instructional university levels. Training and individual variations, 19(1), 28-33.

Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Predicting informative and societal–psychological consequences within the emerging adulthood out-of intelligence, personality, and you may socioeconomic standing. Journal of Personality and Personal Psychology.

Holland, Good. S., & Roisman, G. We. (2008). Large Five character traits and you will matchmaking high quality: Self-reported, observational, and physiological proof. Diary regarding Societal and personal Relationship, 25(5), 811-829.

Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, M. (2006). The partnership ranging from intelligence and you may separation. Log regarding Family Items, 27(12), 1723-1748.

Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology away from Team-B Personality Conditions throughout the Four-Factor Design Perspective. Chinese Mental health Record.

Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). College or university degree and you can non-intellectual ability advancement. Oxford Financial Files, 70(2), 538-562.

Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The fresh new impression away from parents’ and you may spouses’ training for the divorce cost from inside the Norway. sexy filles Maroc Group look, 10, 121-142.

Mathes, E. W., Brennan, S. Meters., Haugen, P. Yards., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Ratings out of physical elegance because a function of age. New Diary from Societal Therapy, 125(2), 157-168.

Mate well worth could possibly get refuse (or perhaps not), although it does maybe not seem to be a shield so you can relationships development

McGue, M., Anderson, Elizabeth. L., Willoughby, Age., Giannelis, Good., Iacono, W. Grams., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Perhaps not because of the grams alone: The benefits of a college education certainly one of those with low levels out of general cognitive element. Intelligence, ninety-five, 101642.

Meier, B. P., Robinson, Yards. D., Carter, Meters. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Was sociable people a great deal more breathtaking? A no-friend study from agreeableness, extraversion, and you can appeal. Log away from Search inside the Identity, 44(2), 293-296.

Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The communication ranging from school poverty and you may agreeableness from inside the predicting academic attainment. Personality and you may Individual Distinctions, 127, 85-88.

General traits regarding personality and you will affectivity due to the fact predictors of fulfillment inside personal matchmaking: Evidence out of worry about?and you may lover?studies

Tatarunaite, Age., Playle, R., Bonnet, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Facial elegance: a good longitudinal data. Western Journal away from Orthodontics and you will Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.

Sarah Ton, Miriam King, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and you will Michael Westberry. Integrated Personal Fool around with Microdata Show, Latest Inhabitants Survey: Version ten.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.

Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. Yards., Allen, Elizabeth. S., & ). Reasons for having split up and you may recollections off premarital intervention: Implications having boosting relationships training. Couples and you may Nearest and dearest Therapy: Look and practice, 2(2), 131.

Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). So why do character traits assume divorce proceedings? Multiple routes as a result of satisfaction. Record of Identification and you can Personal Mindset, 106(6), 978.

Vernon, P. A., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A great. (2008). A behavioral hereditary studies of the Ebony Triad therefore the Big 5. Identity and you can individual Variations, 44(2), 445-452.

Widiger, T. Good., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A great., DeYoung, C. Grams., Kotov, R., … & Wright, An effective. G. (2019). Identification within the a beneficial hierarchical brand of psychopathology. Medical Psychological Technology, 7(1), 77-ninety-five.

The current CPS data dont show if your chance of divorce case is additive. Relationships you will definitely suggest blended marriage ceremonies possess high otherwise straight down risks than just the sum of the dangers of a couple of some one. not, previous search to the breakup and you will knowledge implies that it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). Brand new breakup risk for a few PhD people is approximately fifteen%, similar to the personal likelihood of eight-8% for individual PhD holders.

Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). New mate switching theory. Personality and you can Individual Variations, 104, 143-149.